Door Objects for Access Control
History
The first versions of access control used early
CPUs with several readers connected to multiplex communication
boxes. As systems grew, the communications strategies became
more complex, unwieldy, and slow. The industry moved to distributed
processors that could make the access decisions promptly and
subsequently transmit the history of the transactions back to
the central systems. These distributed processors were set up
to store card numbers, access criteria for the doors that are
served by them, and some number of historical transactions.
The history was added for the case where the communication line
is lost to the central CPU (host computer) or if the system
is using dial-up communication. Since all of the manufacturers
call their distributed processors by different names, I will
use the generic term Smart Remote Box (SRB) for these distributed
processors.
Along with the complexity of the SRBs came the
full interaction ofaccess control systems with alarms for the
access controlled doors. An alarm contact on a card-in/free-exit
door must be shunted for valid transactions. When entering,
a valid card read will shunt the alarm. When exiting,
various devices that will automatically detect a person that
was exiting are used. These devices are typically called a REX,
which stands for Request to Exit. The process of accurately
determining when a door is secure, in transition, held open,
or in a forced open state continues to be a challenge today.
Attempts
at false alarm reduction continue to be made by theusers of
large systems. Many large systems today have more false door
forced alarms and too many door held alarms to allow the central
monitoring area to function appropriately. There are only so
many calls to which a given set of rovers can respond. And it
is useless to spend the dollars for a rover to respond to a
false signal from the system. There is a great economic need
to clean up this part of the access control industry. There
are enough differences in the various doors and hardware that
are served by any manufacturers systems that all of the
possible scenarios of operation have not been fully considered
in the design. Thus, there is a need for operational change.
Getting the manufacturers to make these changes is difficult
because it is very expensive to do safely and correctly. The
ramifications are great.
The microcode structure that defines the SRB actions
at a particular door have historically been stored in Programmable
Read Only Memory (PROM). To change the code in a PROM, the chip
must be replaced, thus requiring physically visiting each SRB.
In the last few years, FLASH memory has become available which
allows the microcode program in the SRB to be downloaded from
the host without the need to physically visit each SRB. With
flash memory, the process of changing the operation of an SRB
is much more efficient. Flash memory has made it possible to
accomplish a door object based microcode download from the host
computer.
Return to Top
